Make an enquiry

    Enquiry Form









    Contact

      Enquiry Form






      Supporting Document


      We are open for business and working remotely Find Out More
      FJG Solicitors in Essex, Colchester, Chelmsford, London – Fisher Jones Greenwood
      • 0845 543 5700
      • [email protected]
      • Make an enquiry
      • Online Payment
      • Home
      • Services
        • Services for you
          • Advocacy
          • Civil & Commercial Disputes
          • Clinical and Medical Negligence
          • Conveyancing
          • Employment Law
          • Family Law
          • Children Law
          • Immigration & Visas
          • Personal Injury
          • Public Law & Human Rights
          • Wills, Life Planning & Probate
        • Services for business
          • Academies Portal
          • Agricultural and Rural
          • Business Immigration
          • Commercial Dispute Resolution
          • Commercial Litigation
          • Professional Negligence
          • Commercial Real Estate
          • Construction Law
          • Planning Consultancy
          • Corporate and Commercial
          • Education Services
          • Employment Law
          • Healthcare Services
          • International Services
          • Landlord & Tenant Services
        • Services by sector
          • Agriculture & Estates
          • Care Homes
          • Charities & Social Enterprise
          • Construction
          • Education Law
          • Energy
          • Family Owned Business
          • Healthcare & Dentistry
      • Our people
      • About us
        • CSR
        • Awards
        • Our Vision
        • Accessibility
        • Careers
        • Work Experience
        • Equality & Diversity
        • FLOCC
        • FJG Foundation
        • SAFE Forum
      • News, Events & Insights
      • Blog
      • Podcasts
      • Contact us
        • Colchester
        • Chelmsford
        • Billericay
        • Clacton-on-Sea
        • Holland-on-Sea
        • London

      Will the 2016 Olympics in Rio be Russian free?

      3 August 2016 by Bushra Elzubeir

      Bushra Elzubeir
      Olympics

      An investigation into an alleged state-run doping program in Russia was launched following information provided by Yulia Stepanova, a Russian 800 meter runner who was herself banned between 2011 to 2013 for abnormalities in her athlete biological passport.  Stepanova has since been branded a traitor by her native country and her family have moved to America after fears for their safety.  Whilst the International Association of Athletics Federations are one of the International Federations to ban Russian participation at the Rio Games, they also invited the IOC to allow Stepanova to compete as an independent athlete.

      “Whistleblowing” has always been a difficult issue for anti-doping bodies.  Aside from the defences available to any athlete involved in an anti-doping rule violation, the provision of information by an athlete on others who are bound to the anti-doping rules is a key strategy employed by those who attempt to catch dopers.  It is one that all agencies encourage, but the disadvantages to the whistleblower are obvious.  This case highlights it on the grandest scale.  The majority of the time, information can be provided and target testing set up based upon that information.  If this leads to a positive finding then the whistleblower need never be named.  Of course, the incentive for providing this information is that the athlete in question has part of their own ban suspended, so when an athlete who is banned for, say, 4 years is allowed to compete again after 2, it is not too big a jump to conclude that they have provided information.

      Stepanova took a big risk, as evidenced from her effective exile from Russia and the reaction to her provision of information and where it has taken us.  Despite this, the IOC ruled that she herself should not be allowed to compete in the Rio Games.  There will always be a conflict in this regard: some will argue that she is a drug cheat and therefore should suffer the same consequences as other drugs cheats; others will argue that whilst she is a drug cheat, her provision of information for the “greater good” should be taken into consideration, that there needs to be an incentive for those who can help doping authorities.  The ruling from the IOC on this will almost certainly have negative repercussions for anti-doping authorities hoping to convince athletes to provide them with information in future.

      Whistleblowing is of course how Lance Armstrong was finally caught for all his doping affairs, of which there were many.  However, by the time Armstrong was banned, there were around a dozen people who had provided information against Armstrong.  The current case involving Russia is very different.  The idea that governing bodies and country officials were actively involved in a doping regime is incredibly serious.  This is what the McLaren report exposed – that there was, beyond a reasonable doubt, a state-run doping program in Russia.

      As explained in a previous blog, the World Anti-Doping Code is unique in that it is a set of rules that’s aim is to harmonise all sports, meaning that regardless of what level and which sport an athlete competes in, the rules are the same and so are the punishments.  The IOC’s decision not to issue a blanket ban on Russian competition at the Rio Games is in conflict with the purpose of the Code.  At the time of writing this article, as reported by the Daily Telegraph, 17 of the 23 federations who need to make a decision on Russian athlete participation have done so, with 10 announcing no sanctions.  Whilst the IAAF and International Cycling Union have taken action, other federations have not.  Notably, United World Wrestling have only banned one Russian athlete from competing due to a doping ban served a decade ago despite the fact that the McLaren report identified 28 manipulated drugs tests by Russian wrestlers, and the International Weightlifting Federation have ruled out two Russian athletes – however, the IWF can issue a blanket ban on a country if three or more positive tests occur from re-testing samples from the previous two Olympic Games.

      Whatever the eventual outcome and whoever does compete from Russia, the whole affair will have left a very bad taste and the issue of doping will again overshadow a major sporting event.  Even in arguably the most anticipated event at the Olympics, the men’s 100 meter final, doping will take centre-stage if there is another Bolt vs Gatlin showdown.

      If you are an athlete or athlete support personnel and find yourself in a similar situation, Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP can help in this very niche area of the law.  We can advise athletes and athlete support personnel throughout the course of anti-doping proceedings and provide expert representation.  We are also able to assist National Governing Bodies meet their regulatory duties and ensure that their anti-doping rules, practices and procedures are in line with UK Anti-Doping’s.  For expert advice on anti-doping, please contact us.

       

      Authors
      Archives
      Subscribe to RSS feed

      Recent Posts

      • What happens when parents disagree on vaccinations?
      • Why is the New Year a good time to make or update your Will?
      • Government reforms make it easier and cheaper for leaseholders to buy  their homes
      @FJGSolicitors

      What happens when parents disagree on vaccinations? In our latest blog, Family Law Partner & Solicitor, Charlotte K… https://t.co/lopnSAsEnq

      15 hours

      FJG would like to say a massive #thankyou to all our wonderful clients who participated in our Charitable Will Camp… https://t.co/hEgB0k8e9S

      3 days

      RT @APIL: “I just felt lost. How can I put it… your life is living in that bed, and if that person doesn’t recover, we’re gone. We cannot f…

      3 days
      Billericay 01277 623132
      Chelmsford 01245 890110
      Colchester 01206 835300
      Clacton 01255 323103
      Holland-on-Sea 01255 818900
      London 08455 435700
      • Disclaimer
      • Accessibility
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookies
      • Price & Service
      • Signup to our Newsletter
      • COVID-19 Risk Assessment
      Website designed and built by Green Square

      Fisher Jones Greenwood is the trading name of Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England ( Number: OC305854 ). A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office at Charter Court, Newcomen Way, Colchester Business Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 9YA

      We are open for business and working remotely

      Here at Fisher Jones Greenwood Solicitors we would like to reassure all our existing and future clients that even in these uncertain and difficult times we are able to assist you with your current and future legal requirements.

      Like so many others, we are constantly monitoring and acting on Government advice and guidelines and as such our offices are temporarily closed to the public. You may, if you wish, visit our offices to post any correspondence and documents through letter boxes.

      As a result of our commitment to innovation and technology, we can and are maintaining a full service, albeit remotely, with all appointments being held digitally or via the telephone. Our case management system enables us to have full access to your electronic file from any location and we have a core team of staff processing all incoming post directly onto your file so that your legal adviser can continue to work with you. We are pleased to say that we do not currently anticipate any disruption to your matter.

      Please do not hesitate to contact your legal adviser by email or by telephone should you have any worries or concerns. Alternatively, please call our main switchboard number (01206 835300) and a message to return your call will be by relayed to the relevant person.

      Finally, everyone at FJG would like to wish you, your families and your colleagues well throughout this current crisis.

      Best wishes
      Paula Cameron
      Managing Partner