Make an enquiry

    Enquiry Form









    Contact

      Enquiry Form






      Supporting Document


      We are open for business and working remotely Find Out More
      FJG Solicitors in Essex, Colchester, Chelmsford, London – Fisher Jones Greenwood
      • 0845 543 5700
      • [email protected]
      • Make an enquiry
      • Online Payment
      • Home
      • Services
        • Services for you
          • Advocacy
          • Civil & Commercial Disputes
          • Clinical and Medical Negligence
          • Conveyancing
          • Employment Law
          • Family Law
          • Children Law
          • Immigration & Visas
          • Personal Injury
          • Public Law & Human Rights
          • Wills, Life Planning & Probate
        • Services for business
          • Academies Portal
          • Agricultural and Rural
          • Business Immigration
          • Commercial Dispute Resolution
          • Commercial Litigation
          • Professional Negligence
          • Commercial Real Estate
          • Construction Law
          • Planning Consultancy
          • Corporate and Commercial
          • Education Services
          • Employment Law
          • Healthcare Services
          • International Services
          • Landlord & Tenant Services
        • Services by sector
          • Agriculture & Estates
          • Care Homes
          • Charities & Social Enterprise
          • Construction
          • Education Law
          • Energy
          • Family Owned Business
          • Healthcare & Dentistry
      • Our people
      • About us
        • CSR
        • Awards
        • Our Vision
        • Accessibility
        • Careers
        • Work Experience
        • Equality & Diversity
        • FLOCC
        • FJG Foundation
        • SAFE Forum
      • News, Events & Insights
      • Blog
      • Podcasts
      • Contact us
        • Colchester
        • Chelmsford
        • Billericay
        • Clacton-on-Sea
        • Holland-on-Sea
        • London

      Mills vs Mills – Supreme Court

      18 July 2018 by Guest Author

      supreme court

      The Supreme Court has today, handed down its judgement in relation to the above case. The matter to be determined by the Supreme Court was as follows;

      In circumstances in which at the time of a divorce a spouse, say a wife, is awarded capital which enables her to purchase a home but later she exhausts the capital by entry into a series of unwise transactions and so develops a need to pay rent, is the Court entitled to decline to increase the order for the husband to make periodical payments to her so as to fund payment of all (or perhaps even any) of her rent even if he could afford to do so.

      Mr and Mrs Mills were divorced in 2002 after a marriage of almost 15 years. Financial matters were resolved by agreement and incorporated in to a Court Order. Mrs Mills received £230,000 (the lion’s share of the capital) to rehouse herself and the child of the family. Mr Mills agreed to pay her £13200 per annum by way of maintenance.  It was anticipated Mrs Mills would rehouse herself mortgage free. However, Mrs Mills rehoused with a mortgage.  Between 2002 and 2009 MRS Mills sold and purchased a series of different properties and with each property the level of the mortgage increased. In addition, Mrs Mills did not necessarily reinvest all of the sale proceeds from one property to the next. In 2009, Mrs Mills sold her final property and moved in to rented accommodation. By April 2015, when the first hearing took place, Mrs Mills had no capital and debts of £42000.

      The first hearing was listed to determine the following applications;

      • Mr Mills application to reduce the level of maintenance he had to pay and
      • Mrs Mills application to increase the level of maintenance to be paid to her

      The judge accepted Mrs Mills had a shortfall of £4,092 per annum between her needs and income. However, the Judge decided that Mrs Mills had not managed her finances wisely and her current needs, in particular her need to pay rent, had been increased by the choices she made. The Judge decided it would be unfair if Mr Mills had to make a full contribution to the rental costs. The Judge decided not to vary the Order at all. The Order continued to provide Mr Mills to pay Mrs Mills £13,200 per annum. This meant Mr Mills would continue to contribute around 60% of Mrs Mills’s rental costs. The Judge expected Mrs Mills to adjust her expenditure to meet the shortfall.

      Mrs Mills appealed to the Court of Appeal. Her appeal was successful on the basis the Judge had not given sufficient reasons why her basic needs should not be met. The maintenance Order was increased to £17,292 per annum.

      Mr Mills appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal concluding the Judge was entitled to decline to vary the maintenance Order so as to require Mr Mills to pay all of Mrs Mills’s rental costs.

      The appeal before the Supreme Court was on a single narrow ground. Given provision had already been made by Mr Mills for Mrs Mills housing needs in the original settlement, should the Court of Appeal have interfered with the Judge’s decision not to increase the maintenance to cover all Mrs Mills rental cost?

      The Supreme Court decided that the original Judge had given clear reasons why he had declined to increase the maintenance Order. The Supreme Court also decided that the original Judge was entitled, although not obliged, to decline to require Mr Mills to fund full payment of the rent commenting that a Court would need to give very good reasons for requiring Mr Mills to make full payment in the circumstances of this case.

      The Supreme Court went on to say that a spouse may well be obliged to make provision for the other spouse. However, an obligation to duplicate that provision in situations such as this is ‘improbable.’

      The issue the Supreme Court considered, in this case, was extremely narrow. The Court has to take a number of matters into consideration when dealing with variation of maintenance applications. If you are considering making such an application or would like to seek advice in relation to such an application, please contact Melanie Wilson on 01245 673767 or email [email protected].

      Credit – blog post written by Melanie Wilson.

      Authors
      Archives
      Subscribe to RSS feed

      Recent Posts

      • What is the process of making a road traffic accident claim?
      • What is Family Mediation Week?
      • What happens when parents disagree on vaccinations?
      @FJGSolicitors

      Legislation will be brought forward to ensure that millions of leaseholders will be given the right to extend their… https://t.co/mzOHbPVUiL

      6 hours

      What happens when parents disagree on vaccinations? In our latest blog, Family Law Partner & Solicitor, Charlotte K… https://t.co/OziiFekgpB

      9 hours

      RT @LawSocietyFAS: If you're purchasing property, it's important to speak to a solicitor about updating your will 👇 #UseASolicitor https://…

      10 hours
      Billericay 01277 623132
      Chelmsford 01245 890110
      Colchester 01206 835300
      Clacton 01255 323103
      Holland-on-Sea 01255 818900
      London 08455 435700
      • Disclaimer
      • Accessibility
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookies
      • Price & Service
      • Signup to our Newsletter
      • COVID-19 Risk Assessment
      Website designed and built by Green Square

      Fisher Jones Greenwood is the trading name of Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England ( Number: OC305854 ). A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office at Charter Court, Newcomen Way, Colchester Business Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 9YA

      We are open for business and working remotely

      Here at Fisher Jones Greenwood Solicitors we would like to reassure all our existing and future clients that even in these uncertain and difficult times we are able to assist you with your current and future legal requirements.

      Like so many others, we are constantly monitoring and acting on Government advice and guidelines and as such our offices are temporarily closed to the public. You may, if you wish, visit our offices to post any correspondence and documents through letter boxes.

      As a result of our commitment to innovation and technology, we can and are maintaining a full service, albeit remotely, with all appointments being held digitally or via the telephone. Our case management system enables us to have full access to your electronic file from any location and we have a core team of staff processing all incoming post directly onto your file so that your legal adviser can continue to work with you. We are pleased to say that we do not currently anticipate any disruption to your matter.

      Please do not hesitate to contact your legal adviser by email or by telephone should you have any worries or concerns. Alternatively, please call our main switchboard number (01206 835300) and a message to return your call will be by relayed to the relevant person.

      Finally, everyone at FJG would like to wish you, your families and your colleagues well throughout this current crisis.

      Best wishes
      Paula Cameron
      Managing Partner