Fraud and deceit are serious allegations within commercial disputes, and their successful pleading requires precision, clarity, and unwavering evidence. For businesses in England and Wales, understanding the legal framework and implications of these claims is crucial, both to pursue or defend against them effectively.

Understanding Fraud and Deceit in the Legal Context

Fraud is not just a synonym for dishonesty. The tort of deceit, also referred to and commonly known as fraudulent misrepresentation, arises when one party deliberately makes a false statement intending to induce another party to act, and that party suffers a loss as a result.

To succeed in a claim, the claimant must establish the following key elements:

  1. False Representation: The defendant must have made a representation that was factually false.
  2. Knowledge of Falsity: The defendant must have known the representation was false or was reckless as to its truth.
  3. Intention to Deceive: The representation must have been made with the intent to induce the claimant to rely on it.
  4. Causation and Loss: The claimant must have relied on the false representation and suffered a loss as a result.

Fraud is an intentional act, and proving it carries a higher evidential burden than negligence or breach of contract. It is often regarded as a “high stakes” claim because of its potential consequences, including reputational damage and the possibility of punitive (additional) remedies.

Procedural Requirements for Pleading Fraud and Deceit

The courts demand particular care in the pleading of fraud. The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), specifically Rule 16, require that fraud be pleaded with specificity. General or vague allegations of dishonesty will not suffice.

Key considerations when drafting a claim involving fraud include:

  • Detailed Facts: The claim must set out the who, what, when, where, and how of the alleged fraudulent conduct.
  • State of Mind: The claim must explicitly allege the defendant’s knowledge of the falsity of their representation or their reckless indifference to the truth.
  • Supporting Evidence: While full evidence is not required at the outset, there must be a credible basis for the allegations. Courts discourage “fishing expeditions” aimed at uncovering fraud without clear grounds.

A failure to plead fraud correctly can result in the claim being struck out or significantly delayed.

Practical and Strategic Considerations

  1. Evidence Collection: Given the evidential burden, businesses must ensure they gather all relevant documentation and witness evidence before making allegations of fraud.
  2. Alternative Claims: Fraudulent misrepresentation often overlaps with other claims, such as negligent misrepresentation or breach of contract. Pleading alternative claims allows for flexibility should the fraud allegation fail.
  3. Risks and Costs: Allegations of fraud can escalate the stakes of a dispute. They often lead to more intensive litigation, increased legal costs, and strained commercial relationships. Claimants should consider these factors carefully before proceeding.
  4. Interim Remedies: Fraud claims can open the door to interim remedies, such as freezing orders, which can secure assets pending judgment. However, these remedies require compelling evidence of the risk of dissipation and depend on the merits of the claim.
  5. Potential Defences: Defendants accused of fraud can challenge the claim on several fronts, including arguing that the representation was not false, the claimant did not rely on it, or that any reliance did not cause the alleged loss. Evidence of the claimant’s own due diligence (or lack thereof) can also be significant.

Consequences of a Successful Fraud Claim

If a fraud claim is successful, remedies can include rescission of contracts, damages (including exemplary damages in rare cases), and recovery of legal costs. However, the court will scrutinise all aspects of the case carefully, given the serious nature of the allegations.

How can we help?Mario Mastantuono

Mario Mastantuono is a solicitor on our dispute resolution team and has extensive experience with complex fraud disputes.

Whether you are considering making a claim or defending one, we can provide expert guidance tailored to your business’s needs.

If you have any queries on the above subject, please do not hesitate to get in touch with Mario on 01206 835269 or complete our online enquiry form.